Are you a victim of racial discrimination in Europe? Do you think European Commission Regulation 2000/43/EC will protect you, offer your recourse?
Wrong! 2000/43/EC, the European Commission's racial discrimination directive / regulation (law) is a fraud, like all their regulations, and I will tell you exactly why. Once you have read this blog, I invite you to agree that the European Union / Commission are a bureaucratic waste of tax payers money, and to vote in your country's elections to leave the EU.
I hereby invite the European Commission Directorate-General of Justice, the European Court of Human Rights, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the European Ombudsman and / or the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to correct / discuss anything I say; I will publish anything along with my response (if any).
1) 2000/43/EC can be ignored.
Providing the member states (the countries of the EU) add the articles of 2000/43/EC onto their legal statute (make it a law), that is all the European Commission demands from them. The way it is then ignored is simple. A member state can set up a race relations / racial discrimination body to "enforce" the law, but the body need have no jurisdiction, for example, over the courts. As such, a member state can simply deny each and every racial discrimination application on the basis (in their view) that the complaints do not meet the submission criteria and that is it; the member state does not even have to count these refused applications in their statistics; amazing. Even when the racial discrimination applications are fully substantiated by expert opinion, they can and are refused like this.
2) 2000/43/EC can be deliberately misinterpreted.
Member states can and do ignore the all important guidelines contained in 2000/43/EC, especially with regard to indirect discrimination / reverse burden of proof / statistical evidence. Incredibly, the European Commission does not require member states to adopt / ensure the guidelines are added to the member states' statutes / enforced. Without these guidelines being adopted, so called "indirect racial discrimination", although allegedly covered by 2000/43/EC, can be ignored. What is "indirect" versus "direct" racial discrimination? It is easier to tell you what direct racial discrimination is (indirect racial discrimination is everything else). Direct racial discrimination is where someone actually states that the reason they are discriminating against you is because you are a racial minority. So, if you are denied your basic human rights and are a minority, as long as the denial of your rights is not stated as being because you are a minority (which, of course, it rarely is), then it is "indirect racial discrimination". So, unless the perpetrator admits that reason for their discrimination as being racially motivated, the European Union country / member state can and do simply say "Your complaint does not meet the submission criteria" and that is it, your complaint is not even recorded as a complaint.
3) The European Court of Human Rights does not adjudicate breaches of 2000/43/EC.
If you have made a racial discrimination complaint under 2000/43/EC in an EU country and it has been unfairly denied / dismissed, you can not complain (make an application) to the ECHR (European Court of Human Rights) as the ECHR only adjudicates breaches of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental, which is nowhere as near as definitive as 2000/43/EC (if 2000/43/EC was enforced, you would have far more rights then you do under the Convention).
4) The European Commission arbitrarily deny any complaints against member states regarding 2000/43/EC, under the authority of the European Court of Justice
If you waste your time and effort complaining to the European Commission Directorate-General of Justice, the EC body with the power to take proceedings against member states for non-implementation / ignoring 2000/43/EC, unless you are well connected (have a well connected expensive lawyer), the European Commission Directorate-General of Justice will deny your complaint, wait for this, on the basis they have absolute discretion granted to them by the European Court of Justice. You see, the European Court of Justice is where proceedings against member states for failures regarding EC Regulations are enforced. And, if the European Commission Directorate-General of Justice decide not to do anything with your complaint, that is it.
In my case, I made a complaint to the European Commission Directorate-General of Justice about a member state, Portugal, that had clearly not implemented 2000/43/EC based on reports from both the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance and the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, against Portugal. That's right, both the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance and the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination issued reports on Portuguese racial discrimination that showed Portugal was ignoring 2000/43/EC. However, the European Commission Directorate-General of Justice decided to ignore these reports as they did not consider them to be expert evidence! The European Commission Directorate-General of Justice went on to say that they were not therefore obliged to consider these reports! When I complained, they replied that they could do whatever they wanted to do, or not, as the European Court of Justice has given them this right! This is what the European Commission actually said;
"In this respect, the Commission must point out that, in
accordance with the established case-law of the Court of Justice, it
enjoys a discretionary power in deciding whether or not to commence
infringement proceedings and to refer a case to the Court. The Court
has also acknowledged the Commission's power to decide at its own
discretion when to commence an action."
I say the European Commission Directorate-General of Justice are bent, corrupt, criminals.
5) The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance has no powers regarding 2000/43/EC
ECRI (the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance) are equally a joke regarding 2000/43/EC. They know and report that EU member states are not providing adequate racial discrimination protection, that European countries are ignoring 2000/43/EC and yet, all they do is write reports and urge member states to improve! ECRI = total joke and waste of time.
6) The European Ombudsman do not give a damn about 2000/43/EC
You have the right of complaint against any EC body (such as the European Commission Directorate-General of Justice) to the European Ombudsman, but don't waste your time; they will only rubber stamp what their colleagues (bureaucratic buddies) elsewhere have decided and you will simply end up wasting more of your time and European tax payer's money. Bear in mind, I made a complaint to the European Commission Directorate-General of Justice backed up with concrete evidence, reports by both the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance and the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. I did not even receive a decision. Instead I received an email inviting me to leave feedback following the rejection of my European Ombudsman complaint; so my complaint was rejected and the European Ombudsman did not even have the professionalism to advise me of this, or as to their reasoning. What makes it even more a joke is that the feedback form does not work; you are meant to rate various aspects of how the European Ombudsman dealt with your complaint, but the legend explaining whether you are ticking boxes that count as excellent or rubbish are not shown, so you do not know whether you are rating the European Ombudsman well or badly! Yet more bureaucratic BS, yet more waste of European tax payers' money.
That's it. There are all these European bureaucrats wasting your and my money. What is worse, 2000/43/EC is not about trade or taxes or movement of goods, it is about human rights abuse. The European Commission Directorate-General of Justice and European Ombudsman are therefore, will all due respect, no only a waste of space and money, but are human garbage steeling from the very people they are meant to protect; I say even thieves have more humanity than the European Commission Directorate-General of Justice and European Ombudsman.
Please, do not expect to have your human rights protected in the EU. racial discrimination is rampant and 2000/43/EC is a joke. Please, vote to leave the EU; put human garbage like the European Commission Directorate-General of Justice and European Ombudsman out of work.
No comments:
Post a Comment